When was the last time that you walked by a restaurant with no one in it and decided to walk in?

Empty seats, how inviting is that?
As I have stated many times, Moderation and Management services have transformed over the last year or so. In the past, Moderation services were strictly thought of in a reactive nature – removal of content and the associated member accounts.
Now, the roles and responsibilities of Community Moderators have expanded to include a more proactive nature. Communities that are just beginning need to be jump-started. Content needs to be posted and interactions need to be portrayed within the community, so when potential members “stumble-upon” the area, they are aware of what is acceptable and allowed; what the community is geared towards. Not only that, members need to be aware of all of the features and functionality that is available to them.
Moderation services can assist with the seeding of content and active facilitation of interactions within a community to get it on track and moving forward. While some communities may need more than others, these services can be tailored to meet any companies needs.
After all, when you visit a restaurant or an online community it is nice to know what you are getting into.

The next time that you think of an online community and how to manage and moderate it, please think of what your needs and goals are, and how you expect to accomplish them – while at the same time, taking a look from the Outside.
Moderation and Management (whether internally or externally driven) of any online community is not something that should be an after-thought, because if it is, you are already setting yourself up to sink.


14 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 2, 2009 at 10:13 am
Impact Interactions
Mike,
Your thoughts are right on the money. We often use the wedding reception analogy (you don’t want to be the first one there with only the bartender to talk to) in order to make the same point.
We have found that using the moderator/moderation terms implies a negative, defensive response from management. This usually results in the 20 minute conversation about criticism instead of focusing upon how to meet member needs and grow the community.
For most communities, what is really needed is faciliation. As a company, we offer these two levels of service for companies needing help with their communities. Once we’ve reviewed why facilitation works so much better, most companies choose that option. Faciliation not only helps to connect members with each other, but it also builds the behavioral norms needed to run a successful community. This in turn reduces the need for defensive moderation. Working with both B2C and B2B clients has proven this again and again.
So perhaps our industry has matured enough to start referring to our services as facilitation rather than moderation. Afterall, the value added by a facilitator is greater than that of a moderator when looking at community growth and its value to an organization.
Mike Rowland
President
Impact Interactions
April 5, 2009 at 7:13 am
Charlie Osmond
Mike(1), good post.
Mike(2), great comment.
I agree the term Moderator is best left unused. Facilitator or Community Manager is better. See an example from a Chris Brogan post and USA Today community here:
Brogan
an empty restaurant
May 3, 2011 at 12:31 pm
Brandice
It was dark when I woke. This is a ray of suhnsine.
May 3, 2011 at 9:44 pm
zxatoio
N9no9C aoslqsqbruws
April 5, 2009 at 11:49 pm
Bryan Person
Scooch:
You’re quite right here. At LiveWorld, we have a “first on the dance floor” expression. Nobody wants to be first; rather, people want to join a party that’s already happening! That gets to having a good launch plan (seeding content, etc.) and having a host who can spark discussions, welcome new members, and connect people to each other.
Bryan | @BryanPerson
LiveWorld
May 4, 2011 at 2:27 pm
Blue
Tankhs for sharing. What a pleasure to read!
April 6, 2009 at 9:42 am
Mike Pascucci
Mike, Charlie, Bryan,
Thank you all for reading and commenting. All great ponits. I just hope that those that are not directly related to Moderation and Management are also reading and assigning a value to these services.
If you do not start with a strong foundation, your community will not be able to survive growth.
Mike
April 6, 2009 at 3:07 pm
Jeff D'Urso
Great post – the “Empty Restauraunt” concept really hits a big challenge. Also reminds me of the “other” PT Barnum Quote: “Nothing draws a crowd like a crowd”. Tools that can help companies / events / social sites get the initial crowd should be in high demand right about now…
April 13, 2009 at 10:28 am
Corporate Responsibility - Social Media « Online Moderation & Management Musings
[…] but they will not stay and you will not be able to retain any member if they see the “Empty Restaurant” (see prior blog post). Finding those key individuals and influences are key to the success […]
July 7, 2010 at 2:40 am
Area 51: Asking the First Questions - Blog – Stack Overflow
[…] But it’s a popular way to avoid the classic “empty restaurant syndrome.” […]
July 15, 2011 at 2:40 am
April Newsletter « Stack Exchange Community Moderator Blog
[…] only way to break that cycle of The “Empty Restaurant” Syndrome is to treat each meta question like gold. That small spark of activity may be just what you need to […]
January 13, 2013 at 6:34 pm
Comments, the fine line between relevance and trash : Gene Expression
[…] it. The current registration system sets the bar too high, and the blog has been beset a bit by empty restaurant syndrome. Once the switch to Disqus happens I’ll try and kickstart discussion again by reengaging. […]
January 14, 2013 at 3:00 pm
Comments, the fine line between relevance and trash | My Blog
[…] it. The current registration system sets the bar too high, and the blog has been beset a bit by empty restaurant syndrome. Once the switch to Disqus happens I’ll try and kickstart discussion again by reengaging. We’ll […]
March 12, 2013 at 1:42 am
Forum Software and the Empty Restaurant Problem | Ninja Post
[…] To address this problem, Mike Pascucci writes that Community Moderators must take a proactive stance: […]