The title of this post is the same as the title for the Editors note in this February’s Inc. – The Magazine for Growing Companies – magazine. I found it to be a very interesting Editors note, and wanted to highlight the closing point from Jane Berentson:
“Maybe we should replace “the customer is always right” with a saying that is more appropriate for the times that we live in: Customers and companies should do right by each other.”
The paragraph before that is actually better:
…customers, too, have a responsibility to make a commercial transaction easy and pleasant, and if something goes awry, they should make their feelings known in a way that’s considerate – and considered. It’s always been possible to complain about a sloppy salesperson or a slow waiter or aggravating help lines, but the Internet makes it possible to criticize in a public forum, which increases the string of that criticism exponentially. The web shouldn’t be a tool for cleverness or cruelty at the expense of someone else. Care should be taken.”
Now I understand that in some cases, emotions get the best of us, but time and time again I have also recognized the way that some of our expectations have become unreasonable. I briefly talked about this in a prior blog post, “Have we become spoiled”, but after reading this Editors note, and observing some recent incidents on Twitter and elsewhere, I wanted to revisit the concept.
Take this potential scenario from Twitter:
Customer – I just had the worst experience with Brand X
Brand X – We are sorry to hear that, please email us (help@brand_x.com) and tell us your story.
Customer – I just sent an email to Brand X and received an automatic email saying that they will get back to me in 7-10 days #fail
Customer – So much for Brand X addressing my situation, can’t believe that I have to wait #fail
Is that really a #fail? As a customer, you were able to vocalize your opinion to your network of people. Brand Y actually did engage with you and sent you down a communication path to inform them of your experience.
Somewhere along the road though, you are not satisfied with that. Is it because you have 10,000 followers and believe that you should be treated differently? What about everyone else whose email are waiting in that queue, why do you all of a sudden feel that your complaint should be put above everyone else’s?
If you do right by them, odds are they will do right by you!
4 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 9, 2010 at 12:24 pm
Chris Haddad
Mike, your example is actually a perfect scenario for describing how a business needs to adapt to today’s world. “7-10 business days” was an acceptable time frame when all we had was phone and snail mail. In the days of Yelp, Twitter, and Facebook, a business has 7-10 MINUTES. Be glad I’m giving you money at all over your competition, and do your best to not screw up and make me regret my decision.
Personally, when I’m evaluating two comparable purchases (Restaurant A vs Restaurant X, Service Provider A vs Service Provider X), and a pricing difference is negligible, I’m going with the purchase that is going to make me feel better as a customer.
I think you’re forgetting that, at the end of the day, we’re talking about money changing hands. And the side that is giving the money is expecting to get something of equal or greater value in return. If that value is never delivered, or delivered poorly with no attempts for timely resolution, I’m going to vent.
Bad news will always beat you home.
March 9, 2010 at 12:36 pm
mikepascucci
Chris,
Thanks for the comment.
Venting is fine, and I agree that businesses need to adapt to the changes.
The business tweet could have said 1-2 business days and the individual would have still felt slighted. Not every business can jump into this new communication medium immediately and need to leverage their “older” processes until they get up to speed. These changes can not occur overnight.
My point is that some who leverage Social Networks in order to complain feel more important and feel that they should be dealt with immediately, because that it what they are used to.
Every customer should be treated in the same manner – unless you are paying the business for extra services. Just because you have a large following on Twitter does not mean that you should be handled before others.
March 18, 2010 at 4:47 pm
Casey Cheshire
Brilliant topic Mike! You bring to light the dark side of over-empowerment.
I’ve personally been in that exact scenario with Smokey Bones in Nashua. I tweeted a concern to them and just like you’ve detailed, was asked to email a full description. I emailed a description of the incident and received a call a few days later. I was extremely pleased with their Social Media execution and results.
Perhaps the email with “7 to 10 days” could be modified and framed in a better light. Remove the estimate of 7-10 days. And perhaps the length of 7-10 days can be modified as well- hiring more staff to handle these issues. When I really think about it, a week and a half is a LONG time to wait when you’re feeling burned by a company.
Should I go as far to say that this sounds like half of the process is efficient and actually cares- the other half needs a jumpstart? Hopefully I’m not branded in that spoiled group for saying so! 😉
March 18, 2010 at 4:51 pm
mikepascucci
Casey,
Thanks for the comment, I like your “over-empowerment” description. Maybe the resolution is to duplicate the current process and funnel it into a different area? Different audience leveraging different social tools have different expectations. If I use email, my expectation may be 7-10 days, but with Twitter, that is much different.
But then again support teams are not scalable either.
Mike